Making felons ineligible to vote, which is often, still exists in the United States.
Although this is a state-by-state policy decision, there has been a general tendency
over the past few decades toward eventually restoring the ability to vote.
Currently, there are many different state policies regarding felony
disenfranchisement.
In all circumstances, “automatic restoration” does not imply automatic voter
registration. Normally, when a person’s rights are restored, jail officials immediately
notify electoral officials. The person is thereafter in charge of re-registering using the
standard procedures. Certain states, including California, demand that voter
registration data be submitted to former prisoners.
This is an open-ended policy that can easily lead to devastating effects. This summer, 20 Floridians who believed they had restored their voting rights after being convicted of a crime were charged by Florida Governor Ron DeSantis. In his efforts to combat voter fraud, he referred to the prosecutions as an “opening salvo,” with his efforts primarily focusing on those just released from prison. However, despite convictions for voter fraud requiring criminal intent, a New York Times review of roughly 400 similar prosecutions nationwide found that instead of preserving the integrity of elections, these prosecutions typically turn up a small number of
people who were unaware they were breaking the law. The report also revealed that
“comfortable retirees” who were charged with the same offense frequently received
less terms than Black people or those who are poor.
The prosecutions of community members who were going home by DeSantis
highlight the crucial part that mass incarceration plays in American elections. He and
others who employ scare tactics to fuel discussions about election integrity argue
that inmates and former inmates are engaging in widespread voter fraud. Simply
said, that is untrue. But the sad truth is that widespread incarceration does have an
impact on our elections, albeit in ways unrelated to voter fraud. Rather, prisons reduce the number of eligible voters by preventing them from exercising their constitutional rights and are frequently utilized to gerrymander voting districts in ways that disadvantage communities of color.
Leave a Reply